First Russian Channel: Israel is sucking the Rothschild “sow”. Representative Feor Borukh Gorin commented on the report shown on Channel One about the Rothschild family “secretly ruling the world” Rothschilds Channel One

Alexander Raikov, blogger

Mom watches “Sunday Time” with Valery Fadeev. They show a story about the sinister Rothschild family, who instigated wars back in the 19th century, and are now feeding both the United States and ISIS. As a version - but quite a version, even without criticism - it talks about a secret world government.

Again. On the First Canal ale. A fragment of the film is played. Produced by the Third Reich.

And this is not a relatively innocent film about the 1936 Olympics. This is a film that directly reflects Nazi anti-Semitism.

“The creation of the film was supervised by Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels himself!” - Mr. Fadeev says with such intonation, as if he was admired by the scale of the responsible person. In any case, there is not a single word of condemnation addressed to the Reich Minister.

Again. On Channel One. As a documentary. A propaganda product is being reproduced. Created by the department. Joseph Goebbels.

On Channel One they show how one disgusting face explains to another that London and Vienna are already under us, and if you combine all the cities we have crushed and add Jerusalem - look here - it’s exactly the Star of David.

Again. On Channel One from all real or fake documentaries about the Rothschilds. They prefer to show a fragment of Hitler’s propaganda. According to which the Star of David expresses a secret conspiracy. The disgusting faces of world Jewry.

All of Mr. Fadeev’s comments on this video are limited to the fact that, of course, it’s 1940, the war, so Germany is propaganda against its military rivals [and before the war, Goebbels, presumably, was a sweetheart and distributed candy to Jewish children]. Then he adds that his The Rothschilds bought the Viennese son from the Nazis, and he avoided the fate of other Jews (a shot from a concentration camp), but the family does not like to remember such an episode. But only.

Again. On Channel One. On the air of the main analytical program. The product of Goebbels's propaganda is demonstrated. About the worldwide Jewish conspiracy. About the abomination of Jewry. About deciphering the Star of David in the spirit of this vile conspiracy. Without notes. No denials. Without a single word about the innocence of the Jews who perished in the concentration camps. Without any more or less critical comments at all. As an exemplary example of documentary filmmaking.

If THIS is not fascism, then what is fascism?

6 million Jews lost their lives just because a handful of inadequate hysterics believed in a conspiracy theory. 27 million Soviet citizens gave their lives to ensure that this misanthropic hysteria would never be heard on air again. Among these millions, most likely, there are many relatives of Mr. Fadeev himself. But these victims do not at all embarrass Mr. Fadeev to repeat on air the words of the people who pushed them to their premature deaths.

The head of the Department of Public Relations of the Federation of Jewish Communities of Russia, Borukh Gorin, commented on the report by Anton Vernitsky, “The Rothschilds, mysterious and powerful,” shown on Channel One of Russian television. How do they fight to rule the world?

“We see how in recent years journalists, in pursuit of sensations, do not hesitate to use extremely dubious, if not “dirty” sources. Unfortunately, the report dedicated to the Rothschild family was no exception. Here, the viewer is presented as truth by the reasoning of conspiracy theorists about the supposedly existing secret world government, which includes the Rothschilds, about their financing of the “Islamic State” (banned in Russia), about the Rothschilds as organizers of the revolution of 1917 in retaliation for the refusal of Nicholas II to transfer control of Central Bank. The level of reporting is eloquently evidenced by the fact that one of the three experts speaking on their own behalf was the writer Yuri Vorobievsky, who publicly stated several years ago that he considered the famous anti-Semitic forgery “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion”, which turned into the “bible of anti-Semites,” to be authentic documents. . It’s sad that Channel One unwittingly acts as a broadcaster of anti-Semitic fakes. Such things do not increase the ratings of TV shows, but the level of interethnic tension in society,” Borukh Gorin emphasized.

Reference: Report by A. Vernitsky “The Rothschilds, mysterious and powerful. How do they fight to rule the world?” was shown in the Channel One program “Sunday Time” on April 2, 2017.

COMMENTS

In our program we talked about the Rockefeller family of American billionaires. John Rockefeller was the richest man in the world at the beginning of the twentieth century. Perhaps the richest in the history of mankind. Then we talked about the Rothschild family. These bankers provided loans to many European monarchies in the 19th century. Their wealth is still enormous.

Conspiracy theorists around the world love these families. The life of these families provides rich soil for numerous historical and political speculations. Conspiracy theorists see in them the secret forces that rule the world. The forces that start and end wars, organize revolutions, change regimes. The forces that move history.

Is it possible? They are not gods, they are people. They are capitalists. And the main interest of a capitalist is profit. They work for their own profit. Did Rockefeller ask himself that the extreme concentration of the oil market he created was hindering America's development? Did the Rothschilds understand that when they manipulated financial markets, this also hindered development?

I think that these smartest people understood everything perfectly. But such a formulation of the question is not for them. They worked for themselves, for their own interests. They increased their capital. Then other players came, new elites with their own interests and gave their answers to such questions. And these answers often led to decisions that were unfavorable to either the Rockefellers or the Rothschilds. For example, the destruction of the oil monopoly in the USA, the Standard Oil company. And no matter what they say about how cleverly John Rockefeller got out, how he retained control in several new companies, he actually lost a lot.

I think the world is too complex to be controlled from one headquarters. But if such a headquarters exists somewhere, it is not on Earth.

Numerous researchers of the life of the Rothschild and Rockefeller families are similar to alchemists. Some have been searching for the philosopher's stone for centuries to no avail, while others are looking for direct evidence of how exactly these families rule the world. What unites alchemists with Rothschild and Rockefeller scholars is the belief that the truth is somewhere nearby.

The Americans Rockefellers made their fortune from oil production. It is not for nothing that the first Rockefeller, John, born in 1839, managed to take control of 90% of the entire US oil industry.

“The Rockefellers are oil geopolitics and food. Back in the 70s, Kissinger said that if you control oil, you control nations, and if you control food, then all of humanity. Genetically modified foods are also in the possession of the Rockefellers, as are chemicals for the agricultural industry,” says economist, writer and political scientist Frederick William Engdahl.

The Europeans, the Rothschilds, built their empire on gold. Long before the Rockefellers. According to legend, the founder of the clan, Mayer Amschel, began by exchanging coins of the German principalities. Today, the family's fortune, according to some estimates, exceeds the UK's GDP - about three and a half trillion dollars.

But the reason for the confrontation between the richest families in the world is the confrontation between gold and oil. Europe and USA. No conspiracy theories. Only business. It's no secret that most of the world's gold is stored in the United States, in the banks of the US Federal Reserve System, which, in turn, is controlled by the Americans Rockefellers. Almost all European countries store gold there. But in 2013, the German Central Bank decided to return its gold, 300 tons. The United States gave it back in parts, stretching the procedure for almost four years. In February 2017, almost everything returned to Germany. Something similar has already happened in history - the French tried to return gold.

“Everyone remembers this episode, it is often mentioned very much. What a fellow De Gaulle is. He took them, collected these nasty green pieces of paper and went to the United States, and threw them away, said: “Take them!” Choke and give back the gold!” But few people know that he carried out the will of the Rothschilds, because de Gaulle was closely connected with the Rothschilds. This backfired on De Gaulle. In 1968, there were unrest in France. In 1969 he flew away. The Rockefellers began to prepare a retaliatory strike. Are you hitting our gold standard? Very good! And we will completely uncouple gold from the dollar. But here the question arises: what can replace gold? Replace with oil,” explains Andrei Fursov, director of the Institute for Systemic and Strategic Analysis.

This is the ongoing struggle between the Americans Rockefellers and the Europeans Rothschilds.

“This is a big game that has been going on since at least the 16th century, it’s about conquering the world by all available means - war, trade, corruption,” says political scientist Emmanuel Leroy.

Then, in 1971, US President Nixon, realizing that others might follow de Gaulle, announced the suspension of the convertibility of the dollar into gold. That is, the dollar was no longer backed by gold. The price of oil came to the fore. Conditions for the world began to be dictated by those who print dollars and control the Federal Reserve System. That is, formally the Americans Rockefellers won then. Now they say that the European Rothschilds have struck back. Like, Donald Trump, the President of the United States, is their protege. However, against the backdrop of the struggle with each other, both the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers are striving for the same thing - increasing their own capital, and therefore influencing the world.

“The influence of these two families in the West is still great, and their era is not about to end. They are not enemies, they are different members of the same board of directors for the globalization of the world,” says Frederick William Engdahl.

It is difficult to predict how the new round of confrontation between the Rothschilds and Rockefellers will end for the world. Conspiracy theorists are talking about the imminent end of the Federal Reserve System and its offspring - the unbacked American dollar. But in this case, according to analysts, the entire global financial system will collapse. However, in the case of research into the activities of the Rothschilds and Rockefellers, it is always difficult to understand where conspiracy theories end and analytics begin. As well as vice versa.

What is known about the results of the negotiations in Milan? Nothing from their participants. They didn’t even hold the usual press conference with streamlined statements that they had agreed to improve the situation. Conclusion - the negotiations were not just “difficult”, as Klimkin called them, but tough, I suppose - ultimatum. But the ultimatum is not announced for gentlemanly reasons.

In my opinion, the United States, which was absent in Milan, presented Putin with an ultimatum: either he “corrects himself” or he will be “very hurt.” The ultimatum was presented through Merkel - Putin speaks little English, but is fluent in German, which is why he was wearing headphones at the table - everyone communicated in English. Putin promised to think about it. But they did not leave him the right to refuse - the United States had already taken the first step obliging Putin to accept the ultimatum: by the evening of October 17, they stopped the fall in the price of oil and even raised it by a couple of dollars. In return they demanded: a) the release of Savchenko and Solntsev; b) agree on October 21 with Ukraine on gas supplies. These are the first steps that Putin must take towards global normalization and a return to the status quo. The final step in their chain should be Putin’s departure from politics within a year. For example, for health reasons, as Yeltsin did on December 31, 1999. Otherwise...

Putin knows that it is “otherwise”. Therefore, it demonstrates negotiability in advance. On October 12, he announced the cessation of “exercises” near the borders of Ukraine and the return of 17.5 thousand military personnel to the barracks. NATO is watching this from space, does not see the withdrawal of troops, and makes a remark to Putin. On October 15, Putin signs the law on financing Russian parties from the state budget, which comes into force on January 1, 2015. On the same day in the Kremlin, at a meeting of the Council for the Development of Civil Society and Human Rights under the President of the Russian Federation, Putin declares - “Kramatorsk is Ukraine, not Novorossiya". To pronounce this phrase, they “roll the ball” to Putin, reporting that supposedly officials in Kramatorsk are denying its residents pensions and child benefits, saying that Kramatorsk is not Ukraine. The source of this complaint to Putin is a certain Elizaveta Glinkina from Ukraine. A fake that allows Putin to show that he has no plans for Ukraine.

On the same day, October 15, US Secretary of State Kerry made an incomprehensible statement that there was a non-public agreement between Poroshenko and Putin as an addition to the Minsk Agreement. Kerry didn’t say what. I won’t guess why or to whom it was addressed. On the same day, a day before the meeting in Milan, Ekho Moskvy broadcasts an interview with Navalny, who is under house arrest, in which he states that Crimea cannot be returned in any way. It seems that Gazprom-Media was against this interview, but it appeared. On October 16, Khodorkovsky made a similar blog entry, after which it became available to the media.

This was not expected from either of them. First assessment, Navalny and Khodorkovsky are preparing for presidential elections, but they are in 2018. It’s too early to flirt with quilted jackets and spoil your image abroad and among your supporters. Hence the conclusion, Navalny was told: in Milan they will “present” Putin and he will not be able to get away from it. Take action.

Only people from the Kremlin, of which he is a project of one of the “towers,” could have given this information to Navalny. Whether Khodorkovsky received it from the White House or the Kremlin, or whether he guessed it himself, does not matter. But both received a signal - Putin is “leaving.” The unexpected “Crimean-nashism” of both is purely mercantile - Crimea must not only be returned, but also reparations must be paid for its occupation, just as Germany paid it to the USSR before 1953. In Ukraine, its size in June was estimated at about 1 trillion. UAH As presidential candidates, Navalny and Khodorkovsky are starting to bargain not to pay this reparation, especially since there may be a separate bill for Donbass. Neither of them wants to pay bills for Putin.

We don’t know what ultimatum the United States presented in Milan through Merkel. But a little analysis and we will get the answer: total confiscation of assets and accounts of Russian companies and officials in the West, along with their dachas, and a total “cover-up” of Russian agents and intelligence services. The agent may not even be imprisoned, but simply sent home in nothing but suits, which is worse for her than while away the time watching TV in a comfortable Dutch prison. The KGB's long-standing 20-year plan to take over the West from within is failing. This is a “nuclear” blow, including to Putin’s professional pride. A strike without missiles, declaration of war and armies crossing borders.

The first signs that the ultimatum mechanism has been launched are the statement of Tim Osborne, lawyer for Yukos investors, to the German magazine Der Spiegel, circulated on October 20 by Deutsche Welle, demanding the confiscation of Russian property in the EU and the United States to compensate for losses to Yukos. The day after Milan, information appears in the media about a Russian submarine off the coast of Sweden, “spying” on the exercises of the Swedish and Dutch fleets. The Swedish Foreign Ministry is very careful in its comments until October 20. But the Swedish newspapers “have a blast”, receiving information from the military. They report: this is the Dmitry Donskoy nuclear submarine, equipped with a Bulava missile system with hypersonic nuclear warheads. The Kremlin denies all this and ultimately assumes that this is not a Russian, but a Dutch submarine.

After Milan, Putin disappears for almost 3 days, just like Stalin after June 22. The website of the President of Russia is not updated on October 18 and 19, as well as on Monday morning. Only at one o'clock in the afternoon does a very brief information appear on it: Putin is conferring with the Minister of Health Veronica Skvortsova. A Russian submarine got lost in the Baltic and is in distress, Lavrov promises to continue selling weapons to Syria and Iraq, and Putin is conferring on the budget of the Ministry of Health.

Putin is considering an ultimatum. Another indirect evidence of this process is the hesitation of his puppet Zakharchenko, who on October 18 unexpectedly declared that the DPR had entered a “phase” of peace with Ukraine, and on October 19 that the city of Berdyansk in the Zaporozhye region was the “ancestral lands” of the DPR and he would return it by force, simultaneously taking Mariupol.

Tomorrow, October 21st, there is a gas test for Putin. Will Putin leave quietly and when, having received guarantees from the US and the EU similar to those received by Yanukovych, or will he continue the war?